| Rk | Athlete | ACE |
SUC |
ATT |
EFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Tripoli |
0.3 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 100.0% |
| 1 |
Don Bosco |
1.7 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 100.0% |
| 3 |
Janesville |
0.2 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 97.7% |
| 4 |
CAL |
0.6 | 4.6 | 4.7 | 97.1% |
| 5 |
Janesville |
0.3 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 96.6% |
| 6 |
Tripoli |
0.2 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 96.3% |
| 7 |
CAL |
0.5 | 3.2 | 3.4 | 95.3% |
| 8 |
Clarksville |
0.3 | 3.4 | 3.6 | 95.2% |
| 9 |
Don Bosco |
0.6 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 94.9% |
| 10 |
Tripoli |
0.5 | 3.2 | 3.4 | 94.0% |
| 11 |
CAL |
0.5 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 93.1% |
| 12 |
Tripoli |
0.2 | 2.4 | 2.6 | 92.8% |
| 13 |
Don Bosco |
0.5 | 3.3 | 3.6 | 92.7% |
| 14 |
Tripoli |
0.9 | 2.9 | 3.2 | 92.3% |
| 15 |
Don Bosco |
0.3 | 2.9 | 3.2 | 91.3% |
| 16 |
Janesville |
0.1 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 90.9% |
| 17 |
North Tama |
0.1 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 89.6% |
| 18 |
Northeast Hamilton |
0.1 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 89.1% |
| 19 |
Clarksville |
0.4 | 2.8 | 3.3 | 85.3% |
| 20 |
Don Bosco |
0.8 | 2.4 | 2.9 | 83.7% |
| 21 |
GMG |
0.3 | 2.1 | 2.5 | 83.6% |
| 22 |
Don Bosco |
0.0 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 83.3% |
| 23 |
Dunkerton |
0.2 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 82.9% |
| 24 |
Janesville |
0.2 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 80.0% |
| 25 |
GMG |
0.2 | 2.3 | 2.8 | 79.5% |
| 26 |
Dunkerton |
0.4 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 79.3% |
| 27 |
North Tama |
0.1 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 77.8% |
| 28 |
GMG |
0.3 | 2.0 | 2.6 | 76.6% |
| 29 |
Dunkerton |
0.3 | 1.9 | 2.5 | 76.0% |
| 30 |
Northeast Hamilton |
0.1 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 73.3% |
| 31 |
Don Bosco |
0.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 72.7% |
| 32 |
North Tama |
0.0 | 1.7 | 2.3 | 71.4% |
| 33 |
Janesville |
0.0 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 69.6% |
| 34 |
Dunkerton |
0.2 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 66.7% |
Volleyball 2007-08
