| Rk | Athlete | ACE |
SUC |
ATT |
EFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Danville |
0.7 | 2.6 | 3.1 | 84.5% |
| 2 |
New London |
0.4 | 2.5 | 2.7 | 91.3% |
| 3 |
Holy Trinity Catholic |
0.3 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 93.5% |
| 4 |
Central Lee |
0.6 | 3.0 | 3.4 | 88.4% |
| 5 |
Burlington Notre Dame |
0.5 | 2.7 | 3.0 | 88.6% |
| 5 |
West Burlington |
0.4 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 90.6% |
| 5 |
New London |
0.3 | 3.0 | 3.3 | 91.0% |
| 8 |
West Burlington |
0.4 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 95.8% |
| 9 |
Cardinal |
0.4 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 93.8% |
| 10 |
West Burlington |
0.3 | 2.9 | 3.2 | 93.0% |
| 10 |
Danville |
0.5 | 2.1 | 2.4 | 87.0% |
| 10 |
Harmony |
0.3 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 98.2% |
| 13 |
Burlington Notre Dame |
0.3 | 2.5 | 2.9 | 87.0% |
| 14 |
Burlington Notre Dame |
0.3 | 2.1 | 2.4 | 87.1% |
| 14 |
Harmony |
0.3 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 91.0% |
| 16 |
Burlington Notre Dame |
0.3 | 3.5 | 3.9 | 89.5% |
| 17 |
Cardinal |
0.2 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 85.4% |
| 18 |
Harmony |
0.2 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 78.6% |
| 19 |
Central Lee |
0.2 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 96.9% |
| 19 |
New London |
0.1 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 93.3% |
| 21 |
Danville |
0.6 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 88.9% |
| 22 |
Central Lee |
0.2 | 2.7 | 3.0 | 90.4% |
| 23 |
Holy Trinity Catholic |
0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 69.0% |
| 24 |
Maharishi |
0.2 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 68.9% |
| 24 |
Maharishi |
0.2 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 93.2% |
| 26 |
Holy Trinity Catholic |
0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 92.9% |
| 27 |
Central Lee |
0.3 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 100.0% |
| 27 |
West Burlington |
0.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 87.5% |
| 29 |
Central Lee |
0.1 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 66.7% |
| 29 |
West Burlington |
0.3 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 75.0% |
| 31 |
Central Lee |
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| 31 |
Central Lee |
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0% |
| 31 |
Maharishi |
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| 31 |
West Burlington |
0.0 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 66.7% |
| 31 |
New London |
0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 100.0% |
Volleyball 2010-11
