| Rk | Athlete | ACE |
SUC |
ATT |
EFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Ankeny |
0.2 | 3.0 | 3.1 | 97.8% |
| 1 |
Ankeny |
0.2 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 91.7% |
| 1 |
Ankeny |
0.3 | 2.1 | 2.6 | 81.1% |
| 1 |
Ankeny |
0.1 | 3.6 | 3.8 | 96.2% |
| 1 |
Ankeny |
0.3 | 4.7 | 4.9 | 94.6% |
| 1 |
Ankeny |
0.2 | 3.9 | 4.1 | 93.5% |
| 1 |
Ankeny |
0.1 | 4.5 | 4.9 | 91.9% |
| 1 |
Ankeny |
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| 1 |
Southeast Polk |
0.6 | 2.8 | 3.4 | 82.5% |
| 1 |
Southeast Polk |
0.3 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 93.9% |
| 1 |
Southeast Polk |
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| 1 |
Southeast Polk |
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| 1 |
Southeast Polk |
0.8 | 3.0 | 3.6 | 83.6% |
| 1 |
Dowling Catholic |
0.6 | 4.5 | 4.9 | 92.8% |
| 1 |
Dowling Catholic |
0.4 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 94.0% |
| 1 |
Dowling Catholic |
0.1 | 3.8 | 4.1 | 94.2% |
| 1 |
Dowling Catholic |
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| 1 |
Dowling Catholic |
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| 1 |
Urbandale |
0.5 | 3.8 | 4.5 | 85.9% |
| 1 |
Urbandale |
0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| 1 |
Urbandale |
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| 1 |
Urbandale |
0.4 | 3.4 | 3.5 | 97.0% |
| 1 |
Johnston |
0.3 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 76.5% |
| 1 |
Johnston |
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| 1 |
Johnston |
0.2 | 2.4 | 2.6 | 93.2% |
| 1 |
Johnston |
0.4 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 92.1% |
| 1 |
Indianola |
0.0 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 83.3% |
| 1 |
Indianola |
0.2 | 2.9 | 3.3 | 87.8% |
| 1 |
Indianola |
0.2 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 94.3% |
| 30 |
Urbandale |
0.3 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 100.0% |
| 30 |
Johnston |
0.1 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 80.0% |
| 30 |
Indianola |
0.4 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 42.9% |
| 30 |
Indianola |
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| 34 |
Ankeny |
0.0 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 100.0% |
| 34 |
Johnston |
0.1 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 64.3% |
| 34 |
Indianola |
0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 100.0% |
| 37 |
Southeast Polk |
0.3 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 83.3% |
| 37 |
Dowling Catholic |
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| 37 |
Urbandale |
0.0 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 66.7% |
| 37 |
Johnston |
0.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 100.0% |
| 41 |
Ankeny |
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| 41 |
Ankeny |
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| 41 |
Urbandale |
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
Volleyball 2010-11
