Basketball 2007-08
QuikStatsIowa
Show Filters

Points

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 89
2
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 78
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 77
4
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 62

Assists

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 28
2
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 21
3
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 19
4
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 16

Rebounds

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 50
2
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 44
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 40
4
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 26

Steals

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 21
2
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 20
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 15
4
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 11

Blocks

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 7
1
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 7
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 4
3
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 4

Field Goals Made

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 38
2
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 33
3
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 31
4
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 18

Field Goal Attempts

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 74
2
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 72
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 61
4
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 46

Field Goal Percentage

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 62.3%
2
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 56.5%
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 58.6%
4
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 39.1%

Three Pointers Made

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 10
2
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 9
3
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 7
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 7

Three Point Attempts

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 27
2
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 24
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 21
4
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 20

Three Point Percentage

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 46.7%
2
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 37.5%
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 60.0%
4
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 50.0%

Free Throws Made

1
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 27
2
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 21
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 19
4
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 17

Free Throw Attempts

1
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 41
2
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 39
3
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 34
4
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 19

Free Throw Percentage

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 85.7%
2
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 80.0%
3
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 100.0%
4
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 89.5%

Effective Field Goal Percentage

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 66.4%
2
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 61.2%
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 61.9%
4
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 48.9%

Offensive Rebounds

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 23
2
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 18
3
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 16
4
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 8

Defensive Rebounds

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 31
2
Danville

Class 2A - SEISC-South

 29
2
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 29
4
Cardinal

Class 1A - SEISC-South

 18
Privacy | Terms | © 2024 BOUND