Basketball 2020-21
QuikStatsIowa

Points

1
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

95
2
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

86
3
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

84
4
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

76
5
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

75

Assists

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

23
2
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

21
3
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

20
3
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

20
3
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

20

Rebounds

1
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

50
2
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

49
3
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

48
4
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

47
5
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

45

Steals

1
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

24
2
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

21
3
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

17
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

17
5
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

16

Blocks

1
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

11
1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

11
3
Van Buren County

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

9
4
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

7
4
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

7

Field Goals Made

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

37
2
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

35
3
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

33
4
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

28
5
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

27

Field Goal Attempts

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

72
2
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

70
3
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

63
3
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

63
5
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

62

Field Goal Percentage

1
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

100.0%
2
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

75.6%
3
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

61.4%
3
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

61.4%
5
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

55.1%

Three Pointers Made

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

13
2
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

11
2
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

11
4
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

10
5
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

9

Three Point Attempts

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

30
2
Van Buren County

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

29
3
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

27
4
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

26
5
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

23

Three Point Percentage

1
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

100.0%
2
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

65.0%
3
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

57.1%
4
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

50.0%
5
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

46.7%

Free Throws Made

1
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

27
2
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

25
3
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

24
3
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

24
5
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

21

Free Throw Attempts

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

39
2
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

37
3
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

35
4
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

32
5
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

30

Free Throw Percentage

1
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

100.0%
2
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

90.0%
3
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

83.3%
4
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

81.8%
5
Van Buren County

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

80.0%

Effective Field Goal Percentage

1
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

116.7%
2
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

84.1%
3
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

70.5%
4
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

67.0%
5
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

66.3%

Offensive Rebounds

1
New London

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

25
2
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

22
2
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

22
4
Burlington Notre Dame

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

21
5
West Burlington

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

18

Defensive Rebounds

1
Cardinal

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-11

36
2
Central Lee

Class 2A - SEISC-South - District 2A-10

33
2
Holy Trinity Catholic

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

33
2
WACO

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

33
5
Danville

Class 1A - SEISC-South - District 1A-8

32
Privacy | Terms | © 2024 BOUND